Tag Archives: lies

HOW SCHEISTERS IN WASHINGTON MISLEAD SO MANY AMERICANS

I copied the transcript of James B. Comey’s spoken statement regarding Hillary Clinton’s Personal Email usage a few days ago, and added my comments / explanations in bold italicized type . . .

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
Washington, D.C.
July 05, 2016
FBI National Press Office
(202) 324-3691
Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing.

Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State. After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

[THE GRAND SETUP]
—————
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways.
First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest.
[ RATIONALIZING — False Pretext to satisfy our desires or interests. A rather childish ploy used on the American public – because they believe your intelligence level to be that of a pre-teen, and many are deceived by this statement. The statement challenges you to accept whatever they tell you, because why would they go out of their way to please public interest if they were liars.]
—————
Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
[ MISPLACED BURDEN OF PROOF — Telling you their statements are not flawed because the FBI has not broken any perceived rules.]
—————
I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
[ALSO MISPLACED BURDEN OF PROOF — The FBI’s employees are not to be on trial – Ms. Clinton is.]
—————
So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.
[A “referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General” — How interesting in that reading about the Intelligence Community Inspector General – who does not seem to have authority to do this with regards to The Secretary of State –  I perused his/her responsibilities which are very dry administrative crap (salaries, benefits, and such) and do cover several agencies, but not The Secretary of State. With John’s and my medical appointment blowing up lately, I don’t know when I will have the time to finish reading the very lengthy crap about this one position. In the early to middle part of the boring crap, it did list about 16 agencies it does have administrative review over – but, like I said, it made no mention of The Secretary of State.
Gee, I don’t know, common sense tells me that President Obama should have made the formal request, since he hired Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State.]
—————
Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.
[“or in a grossly negligent way” – duh – that is the minimum of what was proven, and they said so.]
—————
Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.
I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of e-mail fragments end up unsorted in the server’s unused—or “slack”—space. We searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
[He could have said all of this in a few sentences. Most of the information is not necessary, or repetitive.
contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
“upclassified” to keep us from reading them. Looks like she is guilty from this statement. If it were you or I, it wouldn’t have even gone this far before we would have seen the inside of a prison cell.]
—————
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.
[“several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned ..” and “Some had been deleted over the years” which is not stated that the first were not turned over by Hillary Clinton, and the second is a direct violation of law”
AND finding emails on other employee’s servers that Hillary did not turn over, especially “including high-ranking officials at other agencies”  MEANS these were also deleted and a direct violation of law.
DO WE DETECT A BIT OF “DOWNPLAYING”? WHICH IS A RHETORICAL DEVICE.]
—————
This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
[“Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.” THIS ALONE would have Nixon resigning and impeached!]
—————
With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”
[“have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.” 1. WHAT ABOUT THE ONES NOT YET FOUND? 2. My John has the highest classification of security clearance that existed in the 80’s, and his last duty station was in Washington as Non-Commissioned Officer In Charge of the Classified Files Division at Hdqtr. Marine Corp., and he will not even tell me the content of even one Secret. Other than secrets he took an oath to keep, John and I share everything. I cannot imagine anyone at the level of Secretary of State not required to be on level of secret keeping as my husband.]
—————
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account—or even a commercial account like Gmail—there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.
[More DOWNPLAYING. AND WEASELER RHETORIC – All of this is designed to protect claim from criticism by weakening it. This is dishonest at best.]
—————
It could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails we recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014.
[and More Downplaying and Weaseling!]
—————
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.
[and More Downplaying and Weaseling! When will this stop?]
—————-
It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
[So, ‘we deleted all that had not been turned over to – er – um – well, make sure you could see that there are no more in existence for us to review.’ And, if one of us was in cahoots with whomever – and deleted some that should have been turned over that would have further proven her guilt -well, hahahahaha no one will ever know!!
At this point, it is important to point out all through this there is a certain APPEAL TO IGNORANCE: Trying to convince you that there is a lack of evidence against a claim, (even though they have already told you that there is evidence), hoping that you will believe the claim doesn’t get any positive points. And that is exactly what this person is trying to do in these statements upon similar statements.]
—————
We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
[The RHETORIC is simply trying to persuade you to an unwarranted conclusion, rather than give you logical proof.
Also, “intentional” or not – when you and I break a law – “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, and we are prosecuted!
ALSO, SUCH AN IGNORAMUS WHO BROKE THE LAW WANTS US TO ELECT HER PRESIDENT? EITHER SHE IS AN IGNORAMUS – THEREFORE SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT;
OR –
SHE DID IT DELIBERATELY, AND IS A LIAR AND A CHEAT – THEREFORE SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT!]
—————
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded on e-mail, to those involved in the e-mail production to State, and finally, Secretary Clinton herself.
[MORE APPEAL TO IGNORANCE: Meaningless to John Public and Jane Public, since we do not get to know about any of it.]
—————
Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal e-mail operation.
[More blah, blah, blah to you the Citizen who deserve to know the details.]
—————
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
[Wow – pick your rhetorical device – this could be a GOUP THINK FALLACY, OR RATIONALIZING, OR WISHFUL THINKING, OR COMMON PRACTICE . . . but, either way you slice it – YOU – AMERICA – ARE BEING DELIBERATELY DECEIVED!)
—————
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
[This is actually an argument invoking PITY!! Of course she was smart enough as Secretary of State, and being a lawyer to know that what she did was flamboyantly ILLEGAL!!!!]
—————
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
[SO, SHE IS GUILTY!! (but we will soon ignore that fact.)]
—————
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
[So, we are back to the whole thing – either she is an ignoramus and should never hold public office, or she is a deliberate lying, cheat and should never hold public office.]
—————
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
[ARGUMENT OF COMMON PRACTICE – why everyone is committing the same crime, so what she knows she deliberately did just isn’t thaaaat baaaaad!]
—————
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[ Whoa!!! This paragraph needs to be dissected . . .

1.       With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked.
THEY ARE TELLING YOU THAT THEY DIDN’T FIND ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE OF EVIL HACKERS . . . BUT!!!!
2. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.
THEY ADMIT THEY PROBABLY COULDN’T FIND ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE EVEN IF IT WERE THERE! MAKING #1 STATEMENT USELESS. #1 & #2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THIS STATEMENT, BUT THEY USED IT AGAINST YOU AS A PERFECTIONIST FALLACY.

3. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.
THEY ADMIT THAT HER EMAIL ACCOUNT WAS HACKED BY WAY OF HER EMAIL ACTIVITY WITH OTHERS THAT WERE KNOWN TO BE HACKED. AND THEY ARE HOPING YOU WON’T NOTICE THIS SENTENCE AFTER THE LAST TWO SENTENCES THAT ARE USELESS SENTENCES BECAUSE THEY CANCEL EACH OTHER OUT.

4. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.
[GROUP THINK FALLACY – Identifying with a group takes the place of reason and deliberation on an issue.]

5. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.
[er – um – shouldn’t this make her guilty of something really, really bad????]

6. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[So, why didn’t they use the word treason?]
—————
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
[“In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.” If only it were true!]
—————
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
[OMGoodness!!!! Really????? She knew what she was doing was wrong.  Go back a page or two and this speech says she knew what she was doing, and she knew it was wrong. To say she did not is to say she is a blithering idiot. AND the bad guys hacked her through those she emailed.
—————
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
[Perhaps the person making this statement is the blithering idiot – for how – after identifying all of Hillary’s guilt earlier in this speech – how can he say “we do not see those things here?”]
—————
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
[So, this is clearly the SUBJECTIVISM FALLACY: An assumption that is true for one person, but not for another. So true for Hillary, but not for you and I – to be clear!!!]
—————
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
[PANTS ON FIRE!!! This man has deliberately deceived the American people, and is therefore an un-American citizen who should not be accepted by honest society. Period. It is about time for the good American people to shun snake oil salesmen in lawyer’s suits, who line their own pockets with riches paid to them for their lies and crimes against the American people.]
—————
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
[A BALD FACE LIE; AND IF YOU DON’T SEE IT, THEN YOU AREN’T BEING HONEST WITH YOURSELF, OR YOU ARE CONFUSED.]
—————
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
[Disgusting P O S!
I know a good citizen, a Police Officer, a Detective, who would call this person who delivered this speech a P O S – I added the disgusting for good measure. ]

Copyright © 2016 by Juanita Holloway-Walters, All Rights Reserved

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

END TIME PROPHECY – SIMPLE TO EXPLAIN

There have been a lot of good sermons delivered in the last few weeks, because those in political / societal control are turning the American ship further into deep destructive waters – destructive waters that most Americans are not brave enough to stand up against. Washington is a reflection of the majority in America. For truly, if millions of Americans were keeping Washington in line with God’s traditions and laws, our entire existence would change for the better almost overnight. America would be the nation she once was, when other nations worked to emulate the overall positive existence of the American people. Our government would once again tow the line of the majority of the people for fear of losing their jobs. Satan would crawl back under his familiar rock to hide for another season.  But, I can sum up the reality of all Biblical wisdom, and end time prophecy in one question:

Are YOU going to follow God’s traditions / laws – or man’s?

It is the age old pattern of Israel, and it is the pattern of Christianity, of history repeating itself every time mankind forgets who our Creator is, starts behaving as if men are gods, and forgets that we live for God’s glory. This question above is one that we each must come to terms with, and be prepared to not only live with the consequences, but are forcing our young to also live with the consequences of our individual choice.

It really is that simple to explain. I have recently been asked the age old questions that have been asked of every Christian who has studied the Bible for thousands of years:
1. Don’t all religions lead to salvation?
2. Where in Biblical history are we; isn’t the answer in Revelation?

I explain it like this. Milk Christians often go straight to reading Revelation to find answers. The answers aren’t just in one book of the Bible designed for Milk Christians. Salvation is through Jesus Christ, period. To study Revelation, you must go through every book of the entire (OT & NT) Bible to understand it – why Revelation is at the end. I encourage the masses who have not studied the Bible to do so. You will find answers to questions you didn’t even know you have. Only by studying the Bible will you receive the truth of Who actually wrote it. This is a truth that can only be obtained by your direct experience. I can tell you the truth all day long and give you fifty examples in short order to back it up – but – that will mean nothing to you. You must seek the truth to receive it.

There have been many “pre-tribulation” times throughout history. But, so far, each time, mankind turns the ship of earthly existence back toward living for God’s glory, and turns the ship away from the end times. One time, in the future, mankind will not wake up and turn the ship of all earthly existence back toward living for God’s glory. Only God knows which time that will be. For God lives outside of His creation (space/time continuum), and only He can see when that will happen.

Those of us who think of ourselves as the watchmen are absolutely saying, WOW, today does seem to be the season before the tribulation years – but, we do not know for sure. We are praying mankind wakes up one more time and strives to live for God’s glory. Yes, our nation (and most of the world) are being ruled by the Prince of Darkness – it says so in the Bible. His days are numbered. One day soon the end-time-prophecies will come true . . . or not, if mankind wakes up again. It all revolves around that one sentence – again:

Are YOU going to follow God’s traditions / laws – or man’s?

Copyright © 2016 by Juanita Holloway-Walters, All Rights Reserved

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I KNOW WHEN LIFE BEGINS . . .

In this time between the celebration of our Lord’s birth, and His resurrection, the truth of Communion keeps coming to my mind.  In remembrance of our Lord . . .

“Matthew 26:26 – 29 (KJV) And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

Satan’s desire to thwart God’s plans shows itself in millennium before, and since Jesus time on Earth with mankind. Prophecies regarding our Lord and human history have been interwoven with man’s fiction to create all manner of Cults and grouping of men hell bent on destroying the truth by deception. Not least of which are those that ridicule Communion. For Christian believers, this emotional event is in remembrance of our Lord coming to be with us in human form, and the work of the Cross. In sacrificing His life-blood to cover our sins, He is our savior and our redeemer.

In thinking on this, there was something in this reality of the Lord’s shed blood that I was missing. Then it came to me – the simplest of thoughts – the dimension of life that we all know, but somehow our Supreme Court couldn’t seem to grasp when deciding Roe vs. Wade . . . without blood, there is no beating heart, or working organs in our bodies. Without blood coursing through our veins, there is no life to the body that houses our souls. The Supremes in Roe vs. Wade would not define when life began, and made their decision based on THAT! So very clever a ruse as has ever been perpetrated on mankind.

If you are Christian, the new fetus in our womb is the moment life begins inside our body. We know that we existed in God’s knowing before that moment: “Jeremiah 1:5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee.”

As it turns out, if you are not Christian, the same “moment of life” beginning inside our body is true. I found it easily. I even found it in a source that every school child can find – the Encyclopedia Britannica:

“In the human embryo, the first site of blood formation is the yolk sac. Later in embryonic life, the liver becomes the most important red blood cell-forming organ, but it is soon succeeded by the bone marrow”

Where there is human blood forming, there is life – Period. I further learned that the child’s DNA is in that new blood – the child’s DNA is unique, and wholly separate from the DNA of the mother. We each have God’s truth coursing through our veins. The lie was created to thwart God’s plan, and our shame for allowing this is almost too great to bear. If we ask His forgiveness, we will be forgiven . . . but to continue – is to ask for His wrath. Why we have not heard this from every Christian pulpit in America, I cannot even begin to understand. We are to be diligent truth finders – and this one wasn’t hard to find.

This new government program nicknamed Obamacare promotes the death of our unborn children. Court cases are being fought to force Christians to participate in abortion funding, and distribution. This fact should have been the first clue of the deception of the entire program. After centuries of medical research to improve and extend our lives, social medicine seeks not only to deny men, women, and children equally of these medicinal miracles, but to force participation in the death of unborn miracles. It will not be doctors deciding what medical miracles you may or may not have, it will be brain washed, and power infused administrators. This political disaster has come into fruition because of evil intent by giving the glorious illusion of redistribution of health care, when, in the full implementation of Obamacare – as evidenced in the wording of the bill, even that is a lie.

As we approach these weeks before Easter, I ask you to pray on this daily. I believe in miracles . . . especially when more than just a couple of us are praying together. God bless you.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SOCIAL SECURITY . . . The Short of It:

Social Security is not broke because of those who are legitimately receiving Social Security Funds and / or Social Security Disability  Funds . . . the U.S. government has at least two documents that basically say our federal government has borrowed all the Social Security funds (over periods of time) and owes it to Social Security.
If Social Security is broke, it isn’t because those who put into the system are now taking out what is rightfully theirs. BUT!!!
IT IS BROKE DUE TO THE THEFT OF THOSE FUNDS BY OUR GOVERNMENT TO LINE THE POCKETS OF OUR POLITICIANS & OUR ENEMIES & CRONIES OF POLITICIANS, OUR ALLIES, ILLEGAL ALIENS, ANYONE WHO DID NOT PUT INTO IT BUT IS TAKING OUT OF IT, AND ANYONE WHO PUT MINIMAL AMOUNTS INTO IT AND IS TAKING OUT MORE THAN DUE TO THEM.
FURTHER . . . Every pay raise and benefit (and Hawaiian or European Vacation) our Congress and Administration gives to their selves, is robbing the funds that are owed back to Social Security.

Tagged , , , , , ,

My response to Int’l. Business Times Video

The House has sent many bills to the Senate that will fund the Government entirely, but not Obamacare – The President did this to America – He gave waivers to his Corporate and political and Union cronies, and delayed Obamacare rules for the Corporations – BUT NOT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. We The People will not fund the Bill now that we have read it. Remember Pelosi said you have to pass the bill to read it? Well America has read it and is rejecting it. We The People have asked the House to not fund it. The House holds America’s purse strings and this is what balance of power in government is in action. Harry Reid is a liar – period.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/politics-videos-news/3593/obama-meets-congressional-leaders-amid-shutdown.html#
c
opy link to your browser for video —- of Boehner and Reed after meeting with Obama . . . sad day when this is how the world sees America . . . sad.

Tagged , , , , , ,

HATS OFF TO MR CAVUTO AT FOX:

Mr. Cavuto’s Commentary – BRAVO MR. CAVUTO:
” Obama’s henchman, Senator Harry Reid, and Senate Democrats have not passed a budget in four years. The Senate’s obstructionist, do-nothing policy has refused every attempt of the House to make reasonable changes to the Un-Affordable Health Care Act that would be approved by the people. Changes need to be made such as giving the same waivers to the people as given to the large corporations, Congressional members, and federal workers.

This Administration has refused to keep the National Parks open, resulting in tremendous loss of revenue to lodging and restaurants within the park and ruining the vacations of thousands of tourists; barricaded the World War II Memorial to shut out Honor Tours of WWII veterans; and threatened Veteran’s Administration funding, among many others. Then we have establishment Republicans like Senators Peter King, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and others viciously attacking Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and Rand Paul and Congressman Louie Gohmert, who have been bold enough to stand their ground and serving as the voice of the people who elected them to the Senate and elected the House majority. When have we ever seen the Democrats shoot their own? It doesn’t happen!

It is despicable that 79 senators, including Texas Senator John Cornyn, voted YES on cloture, giving Harry Reid what he wanted! Conservative PACs and the RNC need to run hard-hitting TV ads on the mainstream media late night shows like Leno and Letterman explaining to the people which Party is destroying America if the out-of-control spending is not reined in before the debt limit ceiling is voted.

If not now, when? If not led by the Republicans, who, and why not? Read below what Neil Cavuto told the President.

Neal Cavuto of Fox News explained to President Obama why he, Barack Obama, not Fox News, is responsible for the problems with Obamacare and the debt..

Obama is blaming Fox News for 2/3 of the country disliking Obamacare. Here’s Neil Cavuto’s explanation, and it is great. If you don’t understand what is bad about ObamaCare, please read his comments, and you will understand.

Mr. President, Fox News isn’t what’s making Americans sick about your healthcare law. Your healthcare law is. Welcome, everybody, I’m Neil Cavuto. And excuse this departure from form. But I think this is just poor form. So, it’s time we set some things straight.

Mr. President, we at Fox News are not the problem. I hate to break it to you, sir. You are. Your words are. Your promises are. We didn’t sell this healthcare law. Sir, you did. Remember this?

President Barack Obama:  “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period.”

Mr. President, tell that to tens of thousands of retirees at IBM and Time Warner and dozens of others, who’ve been dumped from their coverage and told to find their own coverage. Fox News didn’t break that news to them, Mr. President. Their companies did.

Fox News didn’t push more of those firms to hire part-time workers. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn’t incentivize fast food restaurants to scale back their benefits. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn’t make doctors want to opt out. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn’t make insurance premiums sky rocket. Your healthcare law did. Just like Fox News didn’t grant hundreds of exemptions to companies that needed them. You did. And Fox News didn’t delay one key provision after another, including online enrollment for those small business exchanges. You did.

Just like it wasn’t Fox News that said we had to pass this to see what was in this. You did. Or was that Nancy Pelosi? Sometimes I’m confused. But of this I am not. Fox News didn’t re-do basic math. Sir, you did. Fox News didn’t say you can cover 30 million more Americans and not see a hit in premiums. You did. Fox News didn’t say you could throw in those with pre-existing conditions and not have to pay for it. You did. Fox News didn’t all but say you could get something for nothing. You did. Fox News didn’t come back years later and say, oh yea, we did raise some taxes. You did.

Here’s where you are right about Fox News, however, Mr. President. We can do math. And did. You cannot. And did not. We said it, and proved it. You didn’t. And we’re all suffering for it. Take it from the numbers guy at Fox. Numbers don’t lie. The number of Americans working part-time and nervous. The number of retirees days away from being dumped on exchanges and anxious. The number of company bosses with any news to pass along on those exchanges, but still clueless. The number of doctors who want out. The number of congressmen now opting out. No, Mr. President, none of those numbers lie.

But with all due respect sir, I can only conclude you do know; I know, I know you hate us at Fox. But please take a look in a mirror, and fast. You think we’re the skunk at your picnic. But that doesn’t mean we’re the ones that stink. Because that smell isn’t coming from the folks reporting on your law. Mr. President, that smell is your law.”

Tagged , , , , , ,

GARDEN OF YOUR GOOD OR EVIL MIND?

I prefer to break issues down to their lowest common denominators . . . Snowden . . . NSA . . . cracking PERSONAL encrypted information . . .
Think about all of this in the following two different aspects —

It isn’t proper to say, “I have nothing to hide.”

ONE ASPECT.
Whereas, I do not mind God seeing and hearing all of my private thoughts, correspondence, and pictures – I DO MIND Satan looking at them and twisting them in any way except how I intended.  That word intended doesn’t help you at all when Satan decides to read into your private thoughts, correspondence, and pictures from his really evil view. It is important to remember that Satan has rule over the Earth temporarily.

SECOND ASPECT.
Have you had a friend or spouse who read something different than what you meant into things you have said or written? Have you had a friend or spouse that pestered you for your opinion on something, then immediately took issue with whatever you said that they forced out of you? Do you think strangers would be more interested in your actual meaning, or applying their own prejudices to whatever you write or say?

FISA COURTS are anti-constitutional and have every opportunity to destroy our U.S. Constitutional Bill of Rights by the very nature of being secretive in their actions against whomever they please. We have a right to public trial, and to know exactly who our accusers are, and what we are being accused of. WE ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY by a preponderance of evidence in a legal trial before a jury of our peers. No GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY has the right to our private thoughts, correspondences, and pictures. Should there be a need to our personal information for a specific legal trial in an American court, those kinds of issues are resolved via the Judge issuing a warrant for specific information during such a trial. All diligent care must be afforded American citizens for such warrants to only be granted the right to specific information regarding a trial – and not a fishing expedition.

By common sense reasoning of the above two aspects, I do not trust any person or entity (especially government persons or entities) to read my personal thoughts and correspondences – or to view or edit my pictures. It is reasonable to expect others, especially strangers, to impose their prejudices upon my personal information.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WE ARE SCREWED . . .

Please pay attention to the attached video, and read this introduction. Please also think long and hard about what is being said in this video. Judge Napolitano has the right of the NSA issues that could potentially affect you on any given day in America. If you have any sort of enemy . . . and that enemy reports lies about you to any agency (including IRS) . . . and they go to the NSA to get enough information through your postings in social sites, your emails both work and personal, and even your medical records, they will find something they can twist and construe to be illegal . . . THEN YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE SCREWED. The favor bank makes the world go round, and there are negative and positive areas of that favor bank. Most of us do not keep tabs on favors coming or going out in our sphere of friends and family. That doesn’t mean that the bad guys don’t have a mental ledger on you of perceived favors, both good and bad.

Have you wondered why there are so many laws and regulations in so many categories, that no one person or a team of persons could possibly know them all? The ‘powers that be’ depend on so many laws and regulations that one could argue that almost anyone is guilty of something if you dig around enough in their life. YOUR LIFE . . . telephone conversations, emails, work correspondence, happy hour conversations that someone else repeated in a casual correspondence, something you said in church regarding your beliefs, and so on . . . are you sure you are completely without something in your life that could be convincingly manipulated to be seen as law breaking? Not only that, but remember, everything rolls downhill – we have a Federal Administration, a Congress, and a multitude of Judges, all deciding which laws they will enforce, which laws they will not enforce, and how each law will be interpreted, with NO consistency among these entities . . . and no honor. Law is no longer based on the U.S. Constitution, but on elusive case law. What is easily done at the top in America is picked up as normal behavior at State and local levels. You already know – whether you are left or right – whether you support them or not – that they not only twist the truth of matters often, but are capable of outright lying. One of your closest friends could owe someone big time in that invisible favor bank of life and betray you, even though it might break their heart and yours for them to do so – or not.

I have experienced someone lying about me and my activities – and their lawyer was a fellow Mason – and the Judge was a fellow Mason – and they bought my lawyer off to assist them in their ‘sting’ (she was going through a divorce herself, and needed the money).  When they have the power of illegal camaraderie, there is nothing legal or peaceful that you can do to stop them. You walk away with your head held up, understanding that the vengeance of the truth is the Lord’s, and you start your life anew. I was so thankful that I had the Lord, and peace within myself.

Don’t get me wrong, I sorely missed the money and furnishings I lost that were rightfully mine. But, my life does not depend on stick and bricks, for sticks and bricks do not make a home. My happiness did not depend on furnishings I had worked and paid for before the marriage, for I was capable of working and buying them again. Walking away is the right thing to do, when fighting will hurt you more than it will hurt anyone else. When dealing with lies and deceit, there is a time to turn and fight, and a time to thank the Lord you made it out with your faith intact.

For each of us the answers to such dilemmas should be basic. You must measure what has been taken from you to see if it has too great of value for you to lose. Anything that is God given to you – by reason and right of your life – is worth fighting for: your life; your child’s life; your liberty; your honest and Godly path to happiness, and what you have earned through the fruits of your labor. When the issue is one of property that is easily replaced, I would prefer not to fight. When the issue is honor, sometimes it is best to walk away a wiser person. I cannot make these decisions for you, and no one else should have the right to make your decisions. In the instance of America’s independence, men chose to come together and fight together to reclaim their lives to be lived with Judeo-Christian values. The greatest nation of free people was the result. Sadly, it is being dismantled before our eyes, and the majority of Americans do not rightly understand the grand and evil plan that is afoot. I pray daily for the Lord’s will to be done.

Too many will see this video and shrug it off as if it doesn’t really matter or pertain to them. If that describes you, I would ask you to recheck your premise. Should we all work with honest and peaceful determination to bring our nation back into the realms of the U. S. Constitution, making certain that our elected and assigned to office follow the law, and remembering that they are civil servants to the American people? Are you otherwise willing to allow our government to continue to deteriorate until the effects of that deteriorated government affect you or your loved ones? I would ask you to take this video very seriously. I am passing it on to you, and asking that you pass it on to every American you know. If they do not understand this video, please help them to understand this serious issue that affects all Americans.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

WHOSE TRUTH DO YOU BELIEVE?

I received some interesting results from my last few blogs. I could go on for weeks posting interesting articles that are sent to me on a daily basis to prove a point regarding the illusive qualities of truth. At a minimum, these articles are very entertaining reading! There is so much information out there in the world-wide-web; finding the truth can be a very cumbersome chore. At the end of the day we do not know who to believe. As a conservative, I am a Blaze subscriber, but even Glenn Beck and I disagree on some fundamental issues such as his (and his loyal employees) take on Social Security and Medicare. Just because we subscribe to a hundred internet sites, does not indicate what we do and do not believe. Rather it could be an indicator of how sincerely we are searching for an ounce of truth . . . one ounce at a time.

I had intended to do similar posts containing partial truths for a few more days, but we need to move on to the point of these posts. Today’s post was to have been the best of The White Hat’s Reports . . . but I received this article from a FB friend this morning, and it kept me reading to the end – whether the truth or fiction it was entertaining:     http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1051-g7banks .

The Boston Marathon Bombing events are no different than what we are bombarded with on the internet. On that awful day:
–     BEFORE THE BOMBING – We saw pictures of people in fatigues with large packs on their backs running with the rest of the runners. I don’t know exactly why these people were running in military garb – and neither do you.
–     BEFORE THE BOMBING – We see a “black ops for hire” group that goes by the name of “Kraft.” They are all dressed the same. They were either having their annual company get-to-gather at the Marathon, or they were hired to stand around and confuse the argument today . . . or they were hired to do “black ops stuff” of which I don’t know what all they actually do – and neither do you.
–     BEFORE THE BOMBING – We see dogs (we are told bomb sniffing dogs) and dog handlers near the finish line. I cannot imagine they were anything but what we were told, but I have no way of knowing – and neither do you.
–     The “person of interest,” becomes exonerated after being tagged as involved with terrorism at the Boston Marathon bombing. This guy has ties with high ups in Saudi – or so we are told. I have no direct way of knowing the truth about this guy – and neither do you.
–     BEFORE THE BOMBING – We see two brothers on film and still photos – who may or may not be Al-Qaida; who may or may not be CIA; who may or may not be FBI; who may or may not be lone wolf operators; and who may or may not be Saudi Terrorists. I have no sure way of knowing – and neither do you.
–     AFTER THE BOMBING – We see one film that is very dark, with police lights, and we hear a lot of gun fire. We are told that the older brother died of wounds and being run over by his younger brother. We see another film that is lit by headlights, and police lights, and we see the naked uninjured older brother being put into the back of a patrol car (which means they tortured him and shot him many times later in the night).” HOW ARE WE TO KNOW THE TRUTH? Are the pictures faked? And he is alive to do whatever it is he does another day? I have no way of knowing any of this – and neither do you.
–     Our presidents have had some unusual relations with Saudi Arabia. Knowing this, how are we supposed to believe anything our government tells us about – well, you know – Saudi’s are not checked before getting on commercial airplanes anymore – BUT YOU ARE, AND YOUR FRAIL GRANDMOTHER IS, A WELL AS YOUR SLEEPING TWO YEAR OLD IN YOUR ARMS?

Whether we are talking about Bush, Obama, Al-Qaida, CIA, FBI, or black ops – – – it could be said that they all believe they are doing the right things. They have tunnel-vision that makes them believe they are right and others are wrong. These people all have one thing in common . . . they believe the ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS . . . which translated means – I can do anything including murder to manipulate you to do what I want you to do if the end result is a good result. OMG!!! These people proved in one day that they could verbally control a large American city – the empty Boston streets was the most UN-AMERICAN thing I think I may have ever seen. Even after 9-11 we were still a mobile nation, including New York.

Unless you are very high up in our government, you and I do not have any way to know the truth from lies regarding events that affect all of us. Much of what America holds to be true today even defies common sense. How did we get here? Has there been a time when Americans had more control over what we did and did not believe? Yes. Certainly when local populations were much smaller, we could be reasonably sure of the local “news.” America grew and prospered, and proved to be made up of mostly good people for long periods in our history.

What was different was our Christian morality that most Americans lived by. What truths do I know that I can build a foundation on today?
–     I know that I am a created being, living in a created existence – created by God.
–     I know that my Creator / God came to Earth as a man, Jesus Christ, and He came to give us the good news of who He is, of who we are, and His plans for me long term.
–     I am instructed to not be deceived (and most of the internet is designed to deceive you). Even a snake oil salesman has to work harder than an internet article to make you believe his elixirs will work miracles.
–     I know that even if I am not held accountable today for evil deeds, I will be held accountable in the future by my Creator / God / Jesus Christ.
–     I know that when our founding fathers asked for God’s divine providence and protection, America grew and prospered. Americans LIVED THE BILL OF RIGHTS and the TEN COMMANDMENTS. Even those who committed crimes recognized when they went against these basic human laws.
–     I know that many people on Earth believe they are having connections with angels / supernatural entities. You better be close to the Lord so you will know the difference between one of God’s good angels such as Mary and Joseph saw and talked to, and Satan’s fallen band of angels. Until Jesus brings me back here with him for the Millennium spoken of in the Bible, Satan is here on Earth with his minions / band of fallen angels. Before the flood of Noah’s time, Satan’s band of angels came to Earth to mingle among us and breed. Those fallen will be here again in the times of trouble described in Revelation. You better be right with God, and pray for help to not be deceived.
–     I know that I am 60 years old, and when I was a child America was infinitely safer than it is now because 95%+ of all Americans, whether Christian or not, lived by Christian morality and values. I recommend to those of you who are not in touch with Christ through His Holy Spirit to get in touch now. America’s Christians from a not too distant past were believers with no reservations. In other words, we are to accept God’s laws, and not tell God that we are going to ignore this part of the Bible, or that part of the Bible. The Bible has all the words that God wanted in the Bible. If it isn’t there, God didn’t want it there. You can take all the “missing  chapters” that men tell you should have been in the Bible and put, them in the wood chipper. We are warned to not take anything away from the scriptures, and not add anything to the scriptures. We are warned to be careful if we are in a position to influence innocent minds, for we will be judged more harshly if we lead innocents astray. Yes, I grew up in a much safer America because Americans lived the Christian morality and values that make life much easier for everyone.

Can you imagine America cities where abortions are not needed, where all babies are wanted, where businesses regulate their own moral behavior, where education is created within local communities . . . where the community made of moral citizens who take responsibility for themselves, their families, and their communities? I can imagine it. I remember the responsible adults I grew up around, and their work ethic, and their generosity. I miss the America who mirrored President Kennedy’s words and truly ‘did not ask what their country could do for them, but asked what they could do for their country.’

I implore all people to remember that the most convincing lies are the ones that are peppered with some truth. When we have a moral foundation in our society, it is easier to decipher life’s issues together. If we are truly approaching the end times, as many of us can only guess at based on the world around us, then we are in a world evolving into the most confusing time in history. The war between good and evil is happening in the spiritual realm, and in the Earthly realm. When our enemies tell us that they are in a religious war with all who are not of their faith, we had better take them at their word. It is time for Americans to make it known which side of the Holy War they are on. If you don’t know which side you are on, it is almost too late for you to figure that out. I quote this often, because it lays it on the line so clearly, no one can read it and not understand . . . Ephesians 6:12 – 13  “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].  Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.”  YES; AND AMEN.

NOTE: My goodness, sometimes it is so hard for me to write. I am committed to posting on my blog every day, and it is only fair to tell you that sometimes I am able to write as well as I was able to years ago – but, sometimes, no matter how many times I read over it to edit – it just seems like a big fuzzy ball that has no real form. I apologize if I do not get the construction done well; I still hope to get the message across with help from above. Tonight’s vision is only double – thankful it is not a triple vision night. LOL God Bless you every one. If I am still fuzzy tomorrow, I will just have to post a song we haven’t heard in a long time, with why it is a good song. Later . . .

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,