Tag Archives: law

HOW SCHEISTERS IN WASHINGTON MISLEAD SO MANY AMERICANS

I copied the transcript of James B. Comey’s spoken statement regarding Hillary Clinton’s Personal Email usage a few days ago, and added my comments / explanations in bold italicized type . . .

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
Washington, D.C.
July 05, 2016
FBI National Press Office
(202) 324-3691
Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing.

Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State. After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

[THE GRAND SETUP]
—————
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways.
First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest.
[ RATIONALIZING — False Pretext to satisfy our desires or interests. A rather childish ploy used on the American public – because they believe your intelligence level to be that of a pre-teen, and many are deceived by this statement. The statement challenges you to accept whatever they tell you, because why would they go out of their way to please public interest if they were liars.]
—————
Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
[ MISPLACED BURDEN OF PROOF — Telling you their statements are not flawed because the FBI has not broken any perceived rules.]
—————
I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
[ALSO MISPLACED BURDEN OF PROOF — The FBI’s employees are not to be on trial – Ms. Clinton is.]
—————
So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.
[A “referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General” — How interesting in that reading about the Intelligence Community Inspector General – who does not seem to have authority to do this with regards to The Secretary of State –  I perused his/her responsibilities which are very dry administrative crap (salaries, benefits, and such) and do cover several agencies, but not The Secretary of State. With John’s and my medical appointment blowing up lately, I don’t know when I will have the time to finish reading the very lengthy crap about this one position. In the early to middle part of the boring crap, it did list about 16 agencies it does have administrative review over – but, like I said, it made no mention of The Secretary of State.
Gee, I don’t know, common sense tells me that President Obama should have made the formal request, since he hired Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State.]
—————
Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.
[“or in a grossly negligent way” – duh – that is the minimum of what was proven, and they said so.]
—————
Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.
I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of e-mail fragments end up unsorted in the server’s unused—or “slack”—space. We searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
[He could have said all of this in a few sentences. Most of the information is not necessary, or repetitive.
contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
“upclassified” to keep us from reading them. Looks like she is guilty from this statement. If it were you or I, it wouldn’t have even gone this far before we would have seen the inside of a prison cell.]
—————
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.
[“several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned ..” and “Some had been deleted over the years” which is not stated that the first were not turned over by Hillary Clinton, and the second is a direct violation of law”
AND finding emails on other employee’s servers that Hillary did not turn over, especially “including high-ranking officials at other agencies”  MEANS these were also deleted and a direct violation of law.
DO WE DETECT A BIT OF “DOWNPLAYING”? WHICH IS A RHETORICAL DEVICE.]
—————
This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
[“Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.” THIS ALONE would have Nixon resigning and impeached!]
—————
With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”
[“have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.” 1. WHAT ABOUT THE ONES NOT YET FOUND? 2. My John has the highest classification of security clearance that existed in the 80’s, and his last duty station was in Washington as Non-Commissioned Officer In Charge of the Classified Files Division at Hdqtr. Marine Corp., and he will not even tell me the content of even one Secret. Other than secrets he took an oath to keep, John and I share everything. I cannot imagine anyone at the level of Secretary of State not required to be on level of secret keeping as my husband.]
—————
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account—or even a commercial account like Gmail—there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.
[More DOWNPLAYING. AND WEASELER RHETORIC – All of this is designed to protect claim from criticism by weakening it. This is dishonest at best.]
—————
It could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails we recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014.
[and More Downplaying and Weaseling!]
—————
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.
[and More Downplaying and Weaseling! When will this stop?]
—————-
It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
[So, ‘we deleted all that had not been turned over to – er – um – well, make sure you could see that there are no more in existence for us to review.’ And, if one of us was in cahoots with whomever – and deleted some that should have been turned over that would have further proven her guilt -well, hahahahaha no one will ever know!!
At this point, it is important to point out all through this there is a certain APPEAL TO IGNORANCE: Trying to convince you that there is a lack of evidence against a claim, (even though they have already told you that there is evidence), hoping that you will believe the claim doesn’t get any positive points. And that is exactly what this person is trying to do in these statements upon similar statements.]
—————
We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
[The RHETORIC is simply trying to persuade you to an unwarranted conclusion, rather than give you logical proof.
Also, “intentional” or not – when you and I break a law – “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, and we are prosecuted!
ALSO, SUCH AN IGNORAMUS WHO BROKE THE LAW WANTS US TO ELECT HER PRESIDENT? EITHER SHE IS AN IGNORAMUS – THEREFORE SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT;
OR –
SHE DID IT DELIBERATELY, AND IS A LIAR AND A CHEAT – THEREFORE SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT!]
—————
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded on e-mail, to those involved in the e-mail production to State, and finally, Secretary Clinton herself.
[MORE APPEAL TO IGNORANCE: Meaningless to John Public and Jane Public, since we do not get to know about any of it.]
—————
Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal e-mail operation.
[More blah, blah, blah to you the Citizen who deserve to know the details.]
—————
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
[Wow – pick your rhetorical device – this could be a GOUP THINK FALLACY, OR RATIONALIZING, OR WISHFUL THINKING, OR COMMON PRACTICE . . . but, either way you slice it – YOU – AMERICA – ARE BEING DELIBERATELY DECEIVED!)
—————
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
[This is actually an argument invoking PITY!! Of course she was smart enough as Secretary of State, and being a lawyer to know that what she did was flamboyantly ILLEGAL!!!!]
—————
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
[SO, SHE IS GUILTY!! (but we will soon ignore that fact.)]
—————
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
[So, we are back to the whole thing – either she is an ignoramus and should never hold public office, or she is a deliberate lying, cheat and should never hold public office.]
—————
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
[ARGUMENT OF COMMON PRACTICE – why everyone is committing the same crime, so what she knows she deliberately did just isn’t thaaaat baaaaad!]
—————
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[ Whoa!!! This paragraph needs to be dissected . . .

1.       With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked.
THEY ARE TELLING YOU THAT THEY DIDN’T FIND ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE OF EVIL HACKERS . . . BUT!!!!
2. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.
THEY ADMIT THEY PROBABLY COULDN’T FIND ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE EVEN IF IT WERE THERE! MAKING #1 STATEMENT USELESS. #1 & #2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THIS STATEMENT, BUT THEY USED IT AGAINST YOU AS A PERFECTIONIST FALLACY.

3. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.
THEY ADMIT THAT HER EMAIL ACCOUNT WAS HACKED BY WAY OF HER EMAIL ACTIVITY WITH OTHERS THAT WERE KNOWN TO BE HACKED. AND THEY ARE HOPING YOU WON’T NOTICE THIS SENTENCE AFTER THE LAST TWO SENTENCES THAT ARE USELESS SENTENCES BECAUSE THEY CANCEL EACH OTHER OUT.

4. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.
[GROUP THINK FALLACY – Identifying with a group takes the place of reason and deliberation on an issue.]

5. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.
[er – um – shouldn’t this make her guilty of something really, really bad????]

6. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[So, why didn’t they use the word treason?]
—————
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
[“In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.” If only it were true!]
—————
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
[OMGoodness!!!! Really????? She knew what she was doing was wrong.  Go back a page or two and this speech says she knew what she was doing, and she knew it was wrong. To say she did not is to say she is a blithering idiot. AND the bad guys hacked her through those she emailed.
—————
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
[Perhaps the person making this statement is the blithering idiot – for how – after identifying all of Hillary’s guilt earlier in this speech – how can he say “we do not see those things here?”]
—————
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
[So, this is clearly the SUBJECTIVISM FALLACY: An assumption that is true for one person, but not for another. So true for Hillary, but not for you and I – to be clear!!!]
—————
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
[PANTS ON FIRE!!! This man has deliberately deceived the American people, and is therefore an un-American citizen who should not be accepted by honest society. Period. It is about time for the good American people to shun snake oil salesmen in lawyer’s suits, who line their own pockets with riches paid to them for their lies and crimes against the American people.]
—————
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
[A BALD FACE LIE; AND IF YOU DON’T SEE IT, THEN YOU AREN’T BEING HONEST WITH YOURSELF, OR YOU ARE CONFUSED.]
—————
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
[Disgusting P O S!
I know a good citizen, a Police Officer, a Detective, who would call this person who delivered this speech a P O S – I added the disgusting for good measure. ]

Copyright © 2016 by Juanita Holloway-Walters, All Rights Reserved

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

END TIME PROPHECY – SIMPLE TO EXPLAIN

There have been a lot of good sermons delivered in the last few weeks, because those in political / societal control are turning the American ship further into deep destructive waters – destructive waters that most Americans are not brave enough to stand up against. Washington is a reflection of the majority in America. For truly, if millions of Americans were keeping Washington in line with God’s traditions and laws, our entire existence would change for the better almost overnight. America would be the nation she once was, when other nations worked to emulate the overall positive existence of the American people. Our government would once again tow the line of the majority of the people for fear of losing their jobs. Satan would crawl back under his familiar rock to hide for another season.  But, I can sum up the reality of all Biblical wisdom, and end time prophecy in one question:

Are YOU going to follow God’s traditions / laws – or man’s?

It is the age old pattern of Israel, and it is the pattern of Christianity, of history repeating itself every time mankind forgets who our Creator is, starts behaving as if men are gods, and forgets that we live for God’s glory. This question above is one that we each must come to terms with, and be prepared to not only live with the consequences, but are forcing our young to also live with the consequences of our individual choice.

It really is that simple to explain. I have recently been asked the age old questions that have been asked of every Christian who has studied the Bible for thousands of years:
1. Don’t all religions lead to salvation?
2. Where in Biblical history are we; isn’t the answer in Revelation?

I explain it like this. Milk Christians often go straight to reading Revelation to find answers. The answers aren’t just in one book of the Bible designed for Milk Christians. Salvation is through Jesus Christ, period. To study Revelation, you must go through every book of the entire (OT & NT) Bible to understand it – why Revelation is at the end. I encourage the masses who have not studied the Bible to do so. You will find answers to questions you didn’t even know you have. Only by studying the Bible will you receive the truth of Who actually wrote it. This is a truth that can only be obtained by your direct experience. I can tell you the truth all day long and give you fifty examples in short order to back it up – but – that will mean nothing to you. You must seek the truth to receive it.

There have been many “pre-tribulation” times throughout history. But, so far, each time, mankind turns the ship of earthly existence back toward living for God’s glory, and turns the ship away from the end times. One time, in the future, mankind will not wake up and turn the ship of all earthly existence back toward living for God’s glory. Only God knows which time that will be. For God lives outside of His creation (space/time continuum), and only He can see when that will happen.

Those of us who think of ourselves as the watchmen are absolutely saying, WOW, today does seem to be the season before the tribulation years – but, we do not know for sure. We are praying mankind wakes up one more time and strives to live for God’s glory. Yes, our nation (and most of the world) are being ruled by the Prince of Darkness – it says so in the Bible. His days are numbered. One day soon the end-time-prophecies will come true . . . or not, if mankind wakes up again. It all revolves around that one sentence – again:

Are YOU going to follow God’s traditions / laws – or man’s?

Copyright © 2016 by Juanita Holloway-Walters, All Rights Reserved

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

GOD HELP US

We The People are not in control.
What the enemy within is getting by with is freaky to many of us.
It is almost mind numbing when you realize that the majority of Americans could care less what happens in and to our almost dead Republic. Only about 5 million of us give a damn –
out of appx. 250 million adult Americans.
I am talking about 5 million Conservative, mostly Christian, Constitutional, Independent or Republican voters who are verbal and work to keep their knowledge of what the hell is going on in some semblance of looking at all sides of the issues.
Reality is a bitch – huh?
When so many Baby Boomers are fighting health battles, it is getting harder to pitch in and fight the enemy within. The enemy within knows it.
When we Baby Boomers pass on, the last memory of the real laws of God for man will likely die with us.
For most, the truth is a relative thing; stealing is justifiable; and the family is elusive.
. . .
Unless by some miracle, we Boomers wake enough people up . . . starting with friends and family . . . co-workers . . . neighbors . . . churches . . .

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FROM THE HEART – COKER / CARDIN – TELL YOUR SENATORS NO TODAY – BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE

The Corker/Cardin legislation must not be supported/ passed – period.
WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION THAT PROVIDES FOR TREATIES –
THE SENATE MUST APPROVE WITH 2/3 MAJORITY VOTE.
THEREFORE, Any legislation passed will weaken the Constitution.
I think Ted Cruz is my man for President,
but !!!
do not support this legislation TO ADD AN AMENDMENT TO THE COKER/CARDIN BILL in any form.
“We The People” in Texas need for Ted Cruz to tell us why we do not enforce our existing law / Constitution.
YOU NEED to ask your Senators in other states, the same question.
Links Below TO:
1.  Article 2, Section 2 of Constitution regarding treaties,
2.  AND to a legal description of this existing Constitutional Law, of which the following is an excerpt:
Treaty-Making Process
Treaties are initiated at the executive level of government usually by the President or the Secretary of State. A representative for the United States is sent to negotiate the terms of the treaty with the representatives of other countries. When the parties agree on the terms, the representative submits the terms to the Secretary of State for approval. If the terms are accepted by the Secretary of State, then the representative will sign the treaty. The Secretary of State submits the treaty to the President for transmittal to the Senate.
Once the President receives the treaty, it is submitted to the Senate for approval. In the Senate, it is referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for consideration. The committee considers the terms of the treaty and, upon approval, submits the treaty to the entire Senate for consideration. The Senate must approve the treaty with a 2/3 majority vote. The President ratifies the treaty and proclaims its entry into force.”
THE LINKS MENTIONED ABOVE:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
https://www.law.asu.edu/library/RossBlakleyLawLibrary/ResearchNow/ResearchGuides/TreatiesandInternationalAgreements.aspx

Copyright © 2015 by Juanita Holloway-Walters

All Rights Reserved.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FROM THE HEART: WHO DO YOU FOLLOW?

Pre-Christian paganism demonstrated the ebb and flow of good and evil. Quite popular today is the atheist preaching that Christianity was fashioned after many pagan religions. If they were to give the Holy Bible and those pagan religions a serious study, I believe they would change their mind.

It has been many years since I studied the religions of the world. It was my opinion then, as well as now, that many pagan religions were prophetic in nature of what was to come – making the population of the world ready for the Old Testament History and Prophecy, and even more for the New Testament History, Prophecy Fulfilled, and End Time Prophecy. The disobedience of mankind goes all the way back to Adam, and it is naïve to believe that the redemption “type” in many pagan religions leading up to the redemption “types” in the Old Testament, are just coincidence. Jesus Christ not only fulfilled hundreds of Biblical prophecies, but also the redemptive qualities in many pagan foundational stories.

Of course, somewhere in the first few scriptures in Genesis, Satan fell from grace (taking a third of the angels with him). Through Satan’s vanity he imagined himself to be the equal of his Creator. We humans have free will to choose who our Lord will be, and we are in the season where much of mankind believes they are greater than their Creator – to believe themselves gods in word and deed. It takes very little research to discover which pagan religions of antiquity through today are influenced by Satan. The religion of life, and the religions of death reveal their opposing nature upon inspection.

God loves us so much – the same as the majority of human parents love their offspring – that He gave us free will. There would be absolutely no meaning to our existence without the ability to choose in a myriad of ways every second we breathe – life or death – God our Creator or other religions / teachings.

Mankind’s existence on this planet has a beginning and will have an end. It seems obvious to me that even though we do not know the day our Lord will take up His Church, or when the 7 years Tribulation will happen after the Rapture, but those who have studied know that we will know the season in time. An expression that we even attribute to our one life on this planet – the spring of life, the summer of life, the fall of life, and the winter of life. If you look at the winter of life, the Tribulation years as like a game, then you could say that the pre-game show is in full swing.

As I have watched so many churches doing their slow turn to a secularist one world religion, we see that most Christians in America have not read their Bible. More than one organization did this research with similar outcome, and you can look those up if you have a mind to find the truth.

Do I believe polls in general? – Probably not.  However –

~ If Christians were reading their Bibles, their decisions regarding every aspect of their life and their community would be different than the America we now have. The enemy within would never have come to power over the American citizens –

~ when I talk to pastors who do not believe the Bible is the word of God –

~ when I see the study of scripture reduced to a “fad phrase” – “WWJD?” (What Would Jesus Do?) – and I have read, and have also been told, the “WWJD?” phrase replaces Bible study because Jesus only preached about “love” –

~ when I see a global conference at the Vatican in Rome in November 2014:
“Rick Warren spoke on the “Biblical Meaning of Marriage” Tuesday at the Vatican, where he is among 30 global religious leaders examining the changing roles of marriage and family in the world.
Warren joined leaders from 23 countries and 14 religions invited by Pope Francis on at the kickoff Monday to The Complementarity of Man and Woman: An International Colloquium.
Just after his address, Pope Francis warmly individually greeted and shook hands with several faith leaders, including President Henry B. Eyring of the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. President Eyring will address the gathering Tuesday. Other speakers include several Catholic leaders, the Rev. Dr. Richard D. Warren, founding pastor of Saddleback Church in California; Dr. Russell D. Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission; Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks and other speakers from the Sikh, Tao, Islamic, Anglican, Mennonite and other religious traditions. . . . Religious scholars will examine how this relationship is lived in cultures and societies of Christians, Buddhists, Sikhs, Taoists, Muslims and Jews. The focus is on the meaning of marriage around the globe, and God’s plan, as understood by religions around the globe.” O C Register

God’s Plan does not include treating women like chattel, polygamy, and many other beliefs the various religions and cultures represented at this meeting. As Christians we are warned to not be deceived by the world. Many Christians are watching in absolute horror the “Chrislam” phenomenon, where Christian leaders are talking about this from both sides of their mouth, because this surely smells of one world religion –

~ when I see our neighbors to the north outlawing the reading of some Biblical Scriptures – labelling them as hate speech –

~when I see American politicians of all ranks praising Islam as the religion of peace, and Christianity as a religion of hate, I know that the prophetic time when good will be believed to be bad, and bad will be believed to be good is upon us.

When I see all of this (and more), I believe the trend towards a secular one world religion is looming on the horizon. If someone had told me even ten years ago that I would be witnessing the persecution of Christians around the world, even in America, I flat out would not have believed them.

We see above what is happening in the world, and so the question for each of us is will we follow the world or will we follow our Lord. “Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.”

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FROM THE HEART: Amnesty and Convoluted Thinking Disease

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/18/ted-cruz-warns-obama-to-stop-spending-on-amnesty-p/
Our elected and appointed government servants break our laws – in this case continuing to spend money on amnesty which our President issued illegally. ““The district court’s order was abundantly clear: The federal court enjoined any and all aspects of the illegal amnesty order,” If the Department of Homeland Security continues moving forward, that on its face is in violation of a federal court injunction.”

Why should any Americans take our laws seriously. Our children are witnessing years of lawlessness by our leaders. What has this done to their developing view of their country?

This comment coming from MEXICO is absurd: . . .”“These programs are a just remedy for millions of families and have the potential to strengthen the important contributions that Mexican immigrants make to the American economy and society,” the ministry said.”

IN MY HONEST OPINION, the Mexican government cannot take care of it’s own, and their remedy for their screwed up nation is to send it’s citizens to America. Maybe it is time for Mexico’s citizens to take their country back and shape it in the image of America. Instead they come here and drain Americans of their jobs, and Americans forced Social Security, Medicare, and Taxes. Illegal immigrants also work to make America more like the home country they abandoned, BECAUSE THEIR LOYALTY REMAINS SOUTH OF OUR BORDER.

Americans allow such convoluted thinking and actions by our elected officials and our neighbors to the south every day of the year by not being peacefully verbal to our leaders!! Only a small portion of Americans contact their leaders. Could you imagine what would happen if 250M+ adult Americans peacefully contacted their leaders every day? Our country just might find that our deficit ceases to grow.

Tagged , , , , ,

FROM THE HEART: THE WIDE DOOR OPEN TO AMERICA’S ENEMIES

As American Christians, who are the super majority, we should never leave our faith (which defines who we are) at the door to enter our homes, our jobs, our schools, or our government. It is amazing that true Americans have bought the lie, and allowed our government to adopt the lie of ‘separation of church and state’ – which is the wide door we left open for our enemies to enter. Have you noticed there is no separation of church and state for our enemies in America? This could not have been possible if American Christians were practicing their faith 24/7/365, and were educated to know what a criminal scam this ‘separation of church and state’ is that our enemies have widely used against us.
Here is a link to my Commentary at Webcommentary.Com of August 10, 2012, titled “American Revival & Mr. Jefferson’s Letters” for information regarding the truth behind the origination of “separation of church and state.” Needless to say, Mr. Jefferson is turning over in his grave – over and over and over . . . – because of a lie in the way the phrase has been used to divorce America from her primarily Christian citizenship.
http://webcommentary.com/php/ShowArticle.php?id=hwaltersj&date=120810

Copyright © 2015 by Juanita Holloway-Walters
All Rights Reserved.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

D-day FDR prayer. (two steps from hell, heart of courage)

Our Christian Faith was our greatest strength. Our Christian God was our protector and definer of who we are as Americans. FDR knew this. Our parents and grandparents knew this. The phrase “Separation of Church and State” is only a quote from one letter, and taken out of context – never anything to do with our Constitution and our Law – A LIE AS IT HAS BEEN USED BY OUR ENEMIES WITHIN TO DESTROY US. What have you done to defeat Satan in this lie? To do nothing is to render all our war heroes to have served in vain, and many to have died in vain.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

HOW DOES AMERICA NOT KNOW THIS?

A few days ago, I was watching a television show and a character on that show was making fun of Christians and the Ten Commandments. This isn’t the first time something so disrespectful comes from prime time entertainment. No one came to the defense of Christianity. It made me angry my grandchildren are exposed to such disrespect for our faith.
In this particular rendition the speaker stated that not coveting thy neighbor’s wife, home, transportation and such was a law that could not be enforced. I was suddenly acutely aware that the Christians in America have become a silent majority. When did we stop teaching Christianity in a way that makes everyone in America respectful of our faith?
When did the Christian majority stop knowing the response to such an unthinking statement? I am not sure who my anger is actually directed at – the disrespectful treatment of my faith – or the silent majority of Christians in America. Have you not seen what is etched in stone all over our federal buildings?
Our founding fathers were on record with the answer to this. Since this is no longer taught in America’s schools, perhaps the answer has already been lost to most Americans. I have read the founding fathers, and know the truth that our nation, and our laws / Constitution were born out of our Judeo/Christian values. The answer to the question is that as faithful Christians, living in a Christian nation, we are supposed to be Self-Enforcing God’s Commandments.
Here is the rub . . . our Republic is based on a Self-Governing population . . . which in human history was made uniquely possible  in Christian America where the population is Self-Enforcing God’s Laws in love, in trust . . . “One Nation Under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice For All.”
When ‘We The People’ are no longer able to Self-Enforce God’s Laws, and Self-Govern under our Constitution (returning the rule of law back to Constitutional Law) – because the second does not work without the first – we will have left our nation open to any band of thugs who want to manipulate the masses with lies and deceit . . . evidenced by the death of our Christian faith, the ruination of our families, and the demise of our economy, our endeavor, and our Republic.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

IN THESE TROUBLING TIMES OF LIES AND TURMOIL IN OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT . . .

I write of faith, honor, personal responsibility, and good vs. evil. I pray America reads Christian commentators, and rekindles our flame for the truth – and one by one The Sleeping Giant of the American people Wake Up. The Sleeping Giant of America was never her government, but the engine behind the government, We the People! Helloooooo? Are you there?

Do not be deceived. The enemy within and outward does not live by our code of honor, truth, and justice. You must never be deceived by the hordes of those who care not for your life, or the lives of your children. Oh Lord, help my nation see God’s Truth and Justice. In life and in death I shall love my God, my Creator, who created me in His Image, in His Truth, in His Commandments of Law. Yes and Amen.

No matter who has invaded the realm of our United States Constitution, we, God’s children will raise His standard once again . . . for our children. Throw off the chains of false money that is a lie. You work for yourselves and your families, and your local communities – this is what has been forgotten. They hope you will become hordes of anger and violence, so they can finally totally control you. Should the unthinkable harms come to America from our own government, you must remain peaceful, faithful, and of sound thought and planning to survive. In the meantime, turn off any media that offends our Christian values and the futures of our children — in violence for the sake of violence — sex for the sake of robbing our children and our marriages of goodness — and “news” designed to trigger your button to destructive anarchy. If anyone moves to encourage you to being brainwashed, tell them that the medias crossed the line of art and / or truth a long, long time ago.

Not to become self-pious as the pretenders of the Faith did many times before. (Inquisition, witch trials, and such in history.) But instead to live in faith, love, and personal charity as our grandparents did as the “greatest generation.” Together, we must re-build our industry / endeavor in America, remembering that we are still the “land of the free, and home of the brave.” We must reject those that come to break our laws openly, and invite those who come here legally. We can improve our immigration laws, but we must reject those who come to take our jobs, and remain loyal to another nation. Those nations all have very strict immigration laws, but shred ours to pieces – We Must Reject such one-sided thinking.

Our Christian strength must grow in our common Christian faith, and not be mired down in man-made denominational and secular curriculum. There will always be Christian denominations before Christ’s return, but they must not divide us as an American Christian Nation.

There are certain aspects of the Bible that we can all understand together. When Jesus walked the Earth in Biblical times, He was a Jew, and His original disciples were Jewish, and preached to the Jewish people. The Old Testament is the story Creation, and of why, who, when, and how Israel began, and its Jewish Biblical history. The New Testament holds the history of the prophecies being fulfilled regarding our Jewish King / Messiah. Because they knew not who Jesus was, God blinded Israel regarding Jesus until the age of the Gentiles / Christians was completed. The New Testament introduces one disciple for the Gentile, Paul. The Pauline Epistles in the New Testament were written for the Christian. The end of the New Testament is primarily written for Israel whom will experience the tribulation. The entire Bible was written for the Jew and the Christian for their learning and understanding of God, Jesus (God come to man on Earth as our Savior and our King), and the Holy Spirit (our connection to Jesus once he left Earth after His resurrection.)

Those are grounds we can meet on and delve into the deeper meanings from that common platform. It is interesting to note that today Jews are becoming believers in Jesus Christ as their personal savior. The entire Holy Bible is a message to man from God that has captured the hearts and minds of men for thousands of years.

The enemy wants you to deny your personal relationship with God, in favor of their group relationship with their false god(s). The enemy is preaching about a combined salvation of their group of political people in lies and treachery. The enemy places human life at the bottom of importance on Earth. They resemble Earth worshipers in their faith. They belittle you and desire to destroy you if you “cling to your Bibles.” The anti- Christian / anti-life enemy is the greatest destroyer of men and women – with their destructive agendas that they paint in pretty pictures that never happen. Their War on Poverty has managed to enslave millions into being dependent on the state, thus robbing them of full lives of good endeavor; and more often robbing them of a personal relationship with the Lord.

May I remind you of the scriptures regarding the “Whole Armour of God”:
“Ephesians 6:10-20 King James Version (KJV)
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. [I implore you to understand exactly what this is saying.]
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;
19 And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,
20 For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.”

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,